I could go on but hopefully you get picture. I also feel that being able to attack ALL sides of a settle doesn't really add much in terms of game play either, I mean most of the time your not dividing your forces to attack multiple walls at once. What are supposed to be huge sprawling cities with hundreds of thousands or even millions of inhabitants look like small forts in the middle of a flat open field. 3Ks' sieges are boring and absolutely un-immersive. I couldn't disagree more concerning 3ks' siege battles, and would beg CA not to go that route. To be honest I really do like sieges in 3K, so I would like Warhammer sieges to be more similar to those. Also it's really could that there are place to hide stealthy unit in city now. Wait, I looked second time on video and there was 3 side from where we could attack. I love that siege map are no bigger but I still would like to have options to attack from few sides. Also I would more prefer to be it like in 3K, that you can pre-build those things in deploy stage. The attacker can surround/encircle the enemy settlement, construct siege weapons which takes a certain number of turns, break the siege or continue the siege. On the campaign map, a siege involves one army attacking an enemy settlement which has walls and a defending army (usually including a garrison army if nothing else). IMO about supplies I have totally no problem with barricades and traps ( although would be nice if instead of self building CA added workers for them) but buildings towers in sieges time is kinda meh. See siege battle for the battle side of things. So maybe change that allow putting weapon teams for Skavens on walls? What is interesting that Cathay force had those javelins on walls. 2K A Total War Saga: Thrones of Britannia.844 A Total War Saga: Fall of the Samurai.
0 kommentar(er)
